If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. safe distance to live from cell phone tower appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While safe distance from cell tower , they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. https://zenwriting.net/rulemoon3/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-structure has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.